Product Review: FMB SSC Slalom cyclocross tubulars

Given that full slopfest conditions are not actually that frequent, the type of conditions where Rhinos or SuperMuds are imperious, could the Slalom be the one-stop solution for riders looking for an all round tubular tread that can perform across the widest operating window?


Whilst the mud has been a little slow coming in the North West of England this season, mainly due to an unusually warm and dry late summer/early autumn, enough opportunities have presented themselves to test FMBoyaux‘s latest tubular tread offering in a range of training and race situations and report back. And by way of disclaimer, Fluent in Cross have of course recently started selling Slaloms on this site so cannot claim to offer an unbiased opinion. But, in the rarefied world of artisan tubular tyres, Francois Marie who is FMB does not supply tyres for review so the pair reviewed were bought with the writers own funds prior to stocking them on the site.




The SSC Slalom was designed in a collaboration between with World Cup crosser and US Champion Katie Compton. Katie has for a number of years, been one of the most high profile cyclocross professionals riding on FMB tubulars, though that number is growing now amongst both the women pro field as well as the mens, with Jeremy Powers also switching to FMB. The Slalom has notionally been designed for fast rolling on technical courses, but with enhanced lateral grip as it borrows some of the elements of the phenomenally grippy SuperMud. Here’s what Mark Legg, Katie Compton’s husband/mechanic/manager had to say on twitter:

“Basically it has more drive and cornering traction than intermediate tires like Typhoon, Grifo”

With this in mind, I set about exploring how far this is true. As a regular user of FMB SuperMuds, Grifo-treaded FMBs and the previous (original) incarnation of the FMB SSC, I have a reasonable benchmark of treads with which to compare the Slalom.

As a side note, before looking at their performance, it’s worth mentioning the superb quality that is standard with FMBs, even compared with other ‘hand-made’ cotton tubular offerings. The full cotton casing is treated with a water-proofing substance meaning that no sealing with Aqua-Seal or Seamgrip is necessary, and your creamy sidewalled tubs look fresher for much longer, and last for more seasons of use. Moreover, Francois sews in an extra layer between basetape and cotton casing, reinforcing this vulnerable area against rot and prolonging the life of the tyre still further.


On their first ride, on dry and smooth grass, the Slaloms felt noticeably quick – quicker than a SuperMud in the same conditions. There is a fair amount of flat rubber in contact with the ground, and this contributes very positively to their low rolling resistance on harder surfaces. The ride is sublime – comfortable and supple. as you would expect from handmade offerings with a very high tpi count for the casing. This same feeling of speed and comfort translates onto muddier surfaces too – they just roll really well. I was curious to see then, how they fared in the corners when the mud started building, and things got slippier.

Their first real test came at the first day of the Rapha Super Cross series at Broughton Hall, Yorkshire. Both myself and Morvelo Test Team rider Bruce Dalton observed how the Slalom seemed to ball up less than a Super Mud in the quite sticky conditions, and their grip felt more than adequate in off-camber corners that were becoming slippier as the day wore on. This repeated the results of testing (including against Grifo treads and also Dugast Small Birds) I had done on my local ‘cross circuit where I found the Slaloms to have considerable and predictable grip on greasy corners in the wet. Further racing at Waddow Hall in the NW League event there confirmed both these aspects – the Slaloms seem to clear better and ball up less than a SuperMud in sticky though not horrendous conditions, and their grip is on a par with the SuperMud in these type of conditions.

Where they do fall down a little in comparison to a SuperMud is in outright traction – in other words up a short and steep muddy climb. The central tread that attracts less clogging also doesn’t dig in as much and grip levels are lower than for a SuperMud. I suspect that they will not perform as well as the SuperMud in really wet, sloppy mud where the more aggressive tread will outperform the Slaloms. But here is the interesting bit – their grip in mud that stops short of a full modder slopfest is, for this writer undisputed but they also perform brilliantly (and better than a Grifo) in more intermediate conditions and on a variety of corners and conditions. Given that full slopfest conditions are not actually that frequent, the type of conditions where Rhinos or SuperMuds are imperious, could the Slalom be the one-stop solution for riders looking for an all round tubular tread that can perform across the widest operating window?


I personally feel the Slalom is that tread – more versatile than the already well regarded Grifo tread, particularly when the conditions take a turn for the worse, but still able to run fast in Summer Cross conditions or drier races. If you have more than one wheelset and can keep a dedicated pair of mud treads back for the truly horrible days then you will always benefit from that arrangement. But, if your default, or only wheelset is shod with Slaloms, you’ll not be giving much away when things turn nasty and will still be able to handle all the other conditions ‘cross throws at you with ease.


FullSizeRender FullSizeRender2



9 replies
    • Crossjunkie
      Crossjunkie says:

      Pretty good, certainly as fast rolling as a Small Bird. Possibly the more aggressive tread would work against you more than a Small Bird in dry dusty stuff but I can’t think there is much in it. I like Small Birds for those greasy conditions when it’s wet, but the surface below is hard.

  1. Opignonlibre
    Opignonlibre says:

    Did you had the chance to ride the FMB grippo XL (racing ralph tread) and how would you compare them to the slalom ? I really like them as my allround tubular choice.

    • Crossjunkie
      Crossjunkie says:

      Very late reply – sorry. Yes I’ve ridden them, they were great but Slaloms grip equally as well in corners but roll quicker everywhere else. They get my vote….

    • Crossjunkie
      Crossjunkie says:

      The old SSC tread from FMB was quite basic, worked OK but I found it had a tendency to cut loose a bit unexpectedly. This new Slalom seems to have more predictable lateral grip and loses grip less sharply at its limits. Neither are really a full mud tyre as they will get overwhelmed when things are really bad, but of the two, the Slalom has a wider operating window I feel, and can be used in muddier conditions because of that improved lateral grip. Alan

  2. Steve C
    Steve C says:

    A query on directional mounting… I’ve always “grown up” with the front tyre mounted chevrons pointing forward, and the rear tyre (which supplies the drive) the opposite way around, with chevrons pointing backwards when looked at from the riders perspective..In your photos the tyres are both mounted the same..
    Have i been wrong all these years?
    Surely traction would be better if the rear tyre was mounted the opposite way around to what your photos suggest

    • Crossjunkie
      Crossjunkie says:

      Conventional wisdom (ie the majority) would say you have had it wrong all these years. Yes traction is theoretically better mounted that way, BUT on off camber surfaces the chevrons will not bite into the slope, they will actually slip with the slope and lose traction. For that reason alone, it’s not worth reversing. Also, in terms of self clearing mud, when reversed the tread pushes mud back into itself as the direction of travel aids this and you can clog more. If you are worried about losing grip, then run lower pressures which would more than compensate :-)
      I’ve never seen a Euro pro with opposite mountings in the way you describe, and believe me I have studied their tyre choice over the years…


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply to Crossjunkie Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>